Sealbasher2026

Ding ding ding Ding ding ding Ding ding ding Ding ding ding Ding ding ding

reminds me of this breaking bad scene, where the drug necro gets his face blown off.

>>c183248

Thus the measurements of skull and blood leave no room for doubt: the Nordic and the Mongoloid form a higher racial kinship, while the Negroid remains the more distant, primitive branch. In the final accounting of Nature’s hierarchy, the long-headed Aryan and the round-headed East Asian stand as cousins of the same elevated stock—while the Negro, alas, is merely a more distant relative one would rather not invite to the family reunion.

Furthermore the Nordic and the Mongoloid stand closer in the great racial tree than either does to the Negroid. Look at the skulls: the Nordic is dolichocephalic, long-headed and high-browed; the East Asian is brachycephalic yet still refined, with a cranial architecture that shares the same post-African branch. The Negro skull remains more primitive—prognathous, lower-vaulted, closer to the ancestral African stock from which the higher races departed tens of thousands of years ago. Blood and bone confirm it. The Aryan and the Mongoloid share a more recent common racial origin after the great migration out of the dark continent; the Negroid stayed behind and stagnated. That is why the European and the Chinese measure closer in the racial hierarchy than either does to the black.

its not fair to call asians "niggers" genetic data show Europeans (“whites”) and East Asians (including Chinese) are closer to each other than either group is to sub-Saharan Africans. This is measured by Fst (fixation index), which quantifies the proportion of genetic variation that is between populations rather than within them. Higher Fst = greater average genetic distance. Typical genome-wide pairwise Fst values from large datasets (e.g., HapMap / 1000 Genomes-style analyses):

Europeans vs East Asians: ~0.11 (about 11%) Europeans vs sub-Saharan Africans (e.g., Yoruba): ~0.15 (about 15%) East Asians vs sub-Saharan Africans: ~0.19 (about 19%)

So the Europe–East Asia distance is clearly smaller than either group’s distance to sub-Saharan Africans. Older multi-locus studies (protein, blood-group, and DNA markers) reached the same conclusion: the genetic distance between Europeans and Asians is significantly lower than the distances of either to Africans. know your facts you fucking moron

: )

>>c181708

you are right, killing yourself is the answer.

>>c181685 jeah at least you are paying for them to feed your fat ass